This week's Friday Feature goes to a cover of Casey Jones!
When I looked at Casey Jones initially, the only thing I could think about in terms of covering was that it would make a great acoustic song for a male singer with a country vibe. So, this week I set out to find someone who not only fit that mold, but did it justice.
Meet Michael Richardson. :)
There aren't a ton of covers of this song on YouTube, believe it or not. And of the handful of covers that do exist, most of them leave a lot to be desired. This one is an exception! Michael has covered this really really well. His voice is great, very well suited to the song. And he plays a Takamine (which I may be biased towards because I learned to play on one) that has a really nice sound, even though it's being played without any amplification, as far as I can tell. Not to mention he's a great guitarist to begin with! He has all the components necessary to do this song well, and it shows. I'm super thrilled to have stumbled upon this one.
More about Michael Richardson: All I could really find on this talented guy was his YouTube channel. But there's a lot on there to look at! He's got a bunch of instructional videos that have accrued thousands of views, and a really successful cover of Lime in the Coconut that I really liked. You can check out his channel here.
Thank you, Michael Richardson, for sharing this with the world!
So, this is a little backwards. A friend of mine and an incredible musician used to cover this one song every time I saw him play, and I loved it. But I never got around to asking him what it was, and he's moved away recently. It's long past time for me to look up what the heck this song is. The internet is so cool.
After a tedious Google search, and about an hour of trying to remember any of the lyrics in the right order, I found it! It's Stay With Me, by Rod Stewart.
First Thoughts: I mean, I've known this song for years without knowing ever hearing the original, so that in itself is satisfying. It's sung so high! My friend always sang it an octave down, apparently. And he always did it just with an acoustic guitar, so to hear it with a full band, and all the harmony and everything is so awesome. And the slide guitar! That's awesome too. I've always wanted to learn to play like that. And this breakdown at the end with the guitar and bass solos is just so good.
Verdict: The original is great. I finally know who sings this awesome piece of music. I have about seven hundred memories associated with this song, so I'm excited to have a name for it. Maybe I'm a little biased, but I love it!
A revisit to All Along The Watchtower- this time, the Jimi Hendrix version.
Current Knowledge: It was suggested that I revisit this one and take a look at the Hendrix version. It's supposedly superior to Dylan's, which wouldn't surprise me, because Jimi Hendrix is kind of the man. I like the song and I know it quite well at this point, so I'm pretty excited to hear this from a totally different artist.
First Thoughts: Oh, there's no contest here. This is WAY better. I can't emphasize that enough though text on the internet. This is the version I've heard covered in bars so many times, but like a thousand times better, cause, ya know, it's Jimi Hendrix. And not that it even needs to be said, because it's totally a given, but the guitar solo is just so damn good. It's like the kind of good that makes you want to stop playing guitar because that kind of skill is practically unachievable.
Verdict: I am so glad I listened to this. I liked the song before, but after hearing this version, I love it. This is one of the best songs that I've written about in quite some time on here. And I'd write more, but I have to go put this on in my car, crank the volume, and drive down the highway at 80 miles an hour.
This week's Friday Feature goes to Rachel Ann Cauilan,with her guitar cover of The Chain, by Fleetwood Mac!
The first Friday Feature ever was an a cappella group, so this week I decided I'd go in the opposite direction and do an instrumental. This is a tough song to play!
Meet the lady who has done it justice, Rachel Ann Cauilan. :)
I listened to the song an extra handful of times before browsing Youtube, and there's a lot of intricate stuff going on in the guitar parts for sure. I wasn't totally sure I was going to find a decent cover anywhere. But it didn't take me too long to come across this really awesome rendition. Not only did Rachel play the entire song pretty much perfectly, her guitar tone is absolutely stellar, which isn't something you find a ton of on the internet, unfortunately. And she says she only learned it the night before recording it! I've been playing guitar for seven years and never would I be confident enough to post something I had only learned that recently, which makes this all the more impressive. Rachel, you are a hell of a player.
If you're interested in hearing more from Rachel, you can check out her Youtube channel here, which includes covers Blackbird and California Dreamin', both favorites of mine. You can also visit her wordpress blog, tumblr, and twitter pages.
Thanks for sharing your guitar skills with the world, Rachel!
Current Knowledge: I've covered two Dead songs in my life. Shakedown Street with an old band, and Friend of the Devil. I was under the impression that The Grateful Dead was a band for hippies and crazy stoners before I heard Friend of the Devil, which is twangy and literally the opposite of Shakedown Street. This has left me very confused about the identity of this band, but two songs isn't an ideal sample size. So I figured I'd add a third.
First Thoughts: This is way more like Friend of the Devil than Shakedown Street. If I didn't know better I'd have guessed that The Eagles wrote this or something, save for the weird little key shift in the middle of the verse. That's not to say I don't like it. I actually do, but I'm pretty surprised that this is the sound of one of their greatest hits. And it's super long, but from what I remember that's a thing with this band. They did include the word cocaine in the hook, so maybe there's something to be said for that.
Verdict: What did I just listen to? Because I'm not really sure it was a Grateful Dead song. Knowing Friend of the Devil has kind of prepared me for something out of the range of what I expected, but that's pretty darn far from it. I guess I categorized them closer to Pink Floyd than The Eagles. Wikipedia to the rescue: "The band was known for its unique and eclectic style, which fused elements of rock, folk, bluegrass, blues, reggae, country, improvisational jazz, psychedelia, and space rock." I am floored by this. They have so many styles that it's like they don't have a style at all. The verdict here is that I don't know anything about The Grateful Dead, I guess. On the matter of the aforementioned tune, though: it's good. I think I like Friend of the Devil better, but that's almost certainly my folk preference shining through here.
Mercedes Benz by Janis Joplin was like the second song on my list. Since listening to it, I have very much taken a liking to it. So much so that I've added it to my regular set list (Since it's a cappella, all I had to do was learn the words!)
A couple weeks ago I played an open mic downtown at a bar called Buffalo Iron Works. It's one of my favorite venues downtown and the open mic is relatively new; I was ecstatic about it's debut, to be honest. Attendance was lacking though, simply because the word hasn't gotten out yet about it. The host, who I'm good friends with, told me I could play as long as I wanted (probably because he knew he was getting out of playing himself). People always get on my case about playing for free and how it's hurting me in the long run, but I love it too much to ever turn down an opportunity. Mercedes Benz was like the fourth song I did.
Now, performing is kind of like a drug. It's not for everyone, but the few that get hooked on it are insatiable. I am one of the (lucky?) few. The catch to this is that you can feel pretty vulnerable up on a stage with a room full of people staring at you, critiquing you whether you like it or not. To play with a guitar is one thing; the guitar can be altered to cover a missing word, and vocals can fill in for a forgotten guitar line - I've done both. It provides a sense of security in a lot of ways. But to take away the guitar altogether is a very different experience. You're totally exposed. If you make a mistake, there is absolutely no hiding it. It's you, your voice, and a room full of potential critics - like American Idol auditions, except these people lose nothing by being totally honest in their thoughts. The point I'm trying to make is that singing totally a cappella in an environment like a bar is a risky and intimidating thing to do, and is something I would usually avoid.
But alas, someone requested I do some Joplin, and I figured now was the time to test this out.
There were maybe twelve people in the bar but they managed to give me a standing ovation anyways. I must've done an okay job. :) Honestly it was my best received song of the night, which was pretty surprising to me. Plus one for doing my homework and actually looking up this song, finally.
In conclusion - Mercedes Benz has earned a permanent spot on the set list, and I've played it at every gig since. Sometimes it pays to be a little risky, I guess.
I love Halloween, I won't lie. So I decided it was only fitting to do a Friday Feature based on an appropriate tune, despite not ever mentioning it on the blog (I already love this song),
Don't Fear the Reaper, as covered by Joshua Path!
I love this tune. I always have. And I was totally shocked to turn to the internet and be disappointed over and over with the covers people have uploaded. Nobody could sing it, nobody could play it. I was about to change songs when I stumbled upon this gem.
Meet Joshua Path.
I don't have enough nice things to say about the way this has been executed. Where the original song is edgy and uptempo, this cover is haunting and light. It's sung flawlessly, and has an incredibly high level of production, which is nothing but beneficial here. Taking out the percussion and slowing it down really smooths out the sound in a way that gives it a ton of dimension and room to appreciate the lyrics. And the harmonies are phenomenal, really, especially the ones written in for the "I'm your man" line. I think that's what made it for me. It's an incredible rendition. Words really don't do it justice; please please please take the time to listen to this. I promise you won't be disappointed.
More on Joshua Path: He's a guitarist/vocalist based out of LA. His sound has been described as “Early Beatles, couched in a sound similar to the Goo Goo Dolls, along with intelligent and creative storytelling not unlike Bob Dylan” by Music Connection Magazine, which I can agree with and then some. He has an impressive bio full of accolades and a sixth CD out, titled, Between Heaven and Jonestown. If you'd like to hear more from him (I certainly do), his website is here: http://www.joshuapath.com/. Thank you, Mr. Path, for doing justice to a phenomenal song that I was certain no one could do.
This is a music review blog. It's not supposed to be for pop music, but I have to make an exception here and talk about T-Swift.
She released 1989 just the other day, and, so far, I have been able to avoid it. If I may be candid, back in the day I was quite the Taylor Swift fan, when she was still a country singer. But I have watched her abandon her talented singer/songwriter roots and devolve into a less-than-appealing cookie cutter pop artist, releasing only songs that I can't stand. But, alas, I figured I'd give her one more chance.
The song I've seen most quoted on the internet so far is Out of the Woods. The title sounds thought out, and like it might have some substance. So I sat down and listened to it with a full open and non-judgmental mind.
It was so bad. :(
The chorus is just clusters of words repeated over and over in monotone, with a lot of synth and drums to make it dance-able. The verses are lacking in substance and all traces of the Taylor Swift that first graced the music scene are completely gone. It sounded so fake and over produced and, not that I was expecting a miracle, I was pretty let down.
And that's what's bugging me. I spend so much time writing myself, and I know how much effort it takes to write a song that's good, verses any song on 1989. (I listened to nearly all the rest in hopes I might find a diamond in the rough. I did not.) All of the good music is being pushed off the radio in favor of this grossly mass-produced pop garbage that is only appealing to teenage girls. And this is a very common complaint about music these days. But good music is still being made! I hear it all the time in some of my favorite artists and on Pandora. If the demand is high and the content is there, why isn't the good stuff on the radio? Why do record labels think they can push this stuff onto the world without retaliation? Because they already are, and they have been doing it for years.
As an indie artist, this is sad, and disheartening. But the upside? Record labels are losing their power thanks to the rise of the internet. An artists can do everything on their own now, with enough work. So, there will never be a lack of bad pop music on the radio, because record labels can still sell it, for now. But their is a back door to this horrendous onslaught of crap, thanks to the advances of music technology. Thanks to YouTube and Spotify and Bandcamp and SoundCloud and Reverbnation and every other site that is used by independent musicians, good music is still out there and available to the world, no matter what is playing on the radio.
And I think (or fervently hope) that in time, record labels will embrace this shift, and bring back the kind of musicians that deserve to be in the spotlight, rather than just industrializing the one thing that isn't supposed to be made generic.
Music isn't for selling, it's an art form, damn it.
Current Knowledge: I think I have heard Fleetwood Mac before. On my Pandora station. But I'm not totally sure, and this song title doesn't sound familiar. Then the other day, a friend of mine was talking about her newfound Fleetwood Mac obsession, so I decided to put it on the list.
First Thoughts: This is cool. It's haunting and twangy in a really cool way. It actually reminds me a little of Helplessly Hoping, which I adore. Maybe I just have a thing for harmonies, because that seems to be a trend with the songs I'm favoring. It starts off pretty withdrawn but it builds up really nicely into a pretty powerful rock ballad. And the bass solo in the middle is a nice divide and break into the instrumental. This honestly sounds like a song I would play with the windows down driving really fast if I wanted to feel like a badass.
Verdict: I really like this. It's carefully straddling the line between twangy country and rock, but it isn't county rock, ya know? I don't know how else to describe it. It's got all the grit you could want and it builds really nicely, but I would love to see it done with just acoustic guitar and vocals, too. I think that would be interesting. Overall, though, this is a cool tune.
In looking at all this classic rock and surrounding myself with people who value this sort of music, it's no surprise that the technical aspects of musical instruments comes up pretty often. This is something I know even less about when compared to "good music". So, here's something that's a bit off the usual beaten path.
Story time. Over the summer I was gifted a guitar.
This is Precious. She was a gift from a very generous friend, and I love her dearly. As I have recently joined a band, having a real nice electric guitar has been absolutely necessary. This particular guitar is a 2006 Elliot Easton model (The guy from The Cars) Gretsch, a solid body in the color of Cadillac green, with a Bigsby tailpiece (that's the whammy bar!) and Gretsch Humbucker pickups. When musician friends of mine see said guitar, the pickups are very often the first thing that get brought up. I know Humbucker = good. But why? What's the difference between them and any other kind of pickups? Don't they all do the same thing?
I did some research, and I'm gonna attempt to break this down in a way that makes sense to someone who has no idea what I'm talking about. Nobody ever explains this stuff to me without making me feel dumb or by using terminology I've never heard. So I'm gonna lay this out in total layman's terms, so that maybe someone else of the less-formally-educated-but-still-musical group can understand what the heck is going on with pickups and why people play favorites.
~
First things first: pickups. Sticking strictly with electric guitar (Acoustic is a whole other ball game), the pickups are what sit under the guitar strings and pick up their vibrations and turn them into sound. In the picture above, they're the two rectangular gold boxes with little black lines and gold dots in em. In a few words, there's a coil in there, and a magnet, which interacts with the strings on the guitar by vibrating and creates a voltage in the coil, which is translated into sound. (I still don't totally understand how this works. All that's important is pickup = sound interpreter.) The main difference between pickups is the sound they create, not surprisingly. And there are several different types.
Single Coil
My first electric guitar (a black Fender Squire that was also a gift and came from one of those $100 guitar/amp box sets, and looks a lot like the picture below) had single coil pickups. They look like this.
This was essentially the first type of pickup created, and is as it sounds; a single coil with two horseshoe shaped magnets in it under the plastic case. Characteristically, these pickups create a sound that is twangy, bright, and cutting. However, different variations on the single coil pickup have been created for different guitars. A Stratocaster guitar (the black guitar above is a Stratocaster) is the brightest and twangiest sounding, while a telecaster (below) style pickup is a bit rounder and warmer sounding, but punchier.
There are variations of these for other brands and guitars, but they all tend to fall somewhere between these two styles. The drawback to single coil is that they tend to make a bit of a buzzing sound; think of the hum you often hear when a guitar is plugged into an amp but not being played. Modern technology, however has helped to create "noiseless" versions of them. These pickups are most popular on Fender brand guitars.
P90
A P90 pickup is very similar to a single coil. They often look like this:
From the outside, they're wider and are thicker than a single coil pickup, though it is just a single coil inside. This coil, however, is much wider. It allows the pickup to "hear" more, resulting in a bigger sound that isn't as bright or twangy. It can also produce a higher output, which means it can get louder, and boosts the mid-range tones of the guitar. This gives them a lot of versatility. They come in a couple different designs and colors, but they work just the same as a single coil. (A note: I don't see these used nearly as much as single coil or Humbuckers.)
Humbuckers
These bad boys look like the ones on Precious. But they can also look like this:
The difference here is that each pickup contains two coils instead of one. The two opposing coils are designed to "buck", or cancel, the pesky aforementioned "hum", hence the name. Aside from doing that, adding a second coil increases the output of the guitar, so it can get even louder, and really cuts back on some of the higher frequencies. Guitars with these pickups sound warm and powerful, which is exactly how one would like their guitar to sound on many occasions. The name humbucker has become the blanket term for all guitar pickups with two coils, though it is possible to have a double coil pickup with no humbucking action.
Which brings me to my next point. There are still a TON of other things that can effect the sound of the guitar. How many times the coil was wound, the type of magnet used, the placement of the pickup on the guitar, what company made the pickups and for which guitar they were made, the way the guitar was built, the kind of strings, whether the pickup covers are on or off, the brand of guitar, the amplifier, etc, etc. There are even distinctions between active and passive pickups, an active pickup having a battery powered circuit to create a "hotter" or louder sound, though most pickups are passive. People often create their own custom setups involving all of these parts. And it all comes down to what sounds good to a particular person. There are generic universal ideas about what sounds good, and then there are the needs of the individual musicians playing their guitars. Sometimes a guitarist is going to want a bright tone with a lot of treble. Sometimes a guitarist wants to be as loud and as powerful as possible. Most of the time, the guitarist wants to sound how they think is best, and that's usually somewhere in between all of these things. It's all about preference.
Hopefully I've shed some light on the subject at hand (I learned a ridiculous amount; the internet is a beautiful thing). I know it's a bit off topic from what I usually post, but I think it really adds to the knowledge base I'm acquiring here (hint: that means there will be more stuff like this, cause I liked doing it a lot).
I'll leave you with this, an awesome example of most of what I've just explained. Even a totally untrained ear can hear the differences, and it's not hard to see that both humbuckers and single coils have their place in the guitar world.
